SUPPLEMENTAL CASE: Chapter 1 Case: HR, Culture, and Business Results Success at Google, Scripps, and UPS Firms in a variety of industries have been recognized as being among the Most Admired Companies by Fortune magazine. Others have been highlighted as being the Best Companies to Work For by Fortune or as Optimas Award winners by Workforce Management. These recognitions contain some common elements because of how HR management has contributed to organizational success and is being positively viewed by employees. Three examples are highlighted here. One recognized firm is Google, which is well known by many individuals because of its Internet components. Google has an HR image as a creative contributor to business objectives through its work environment guided by HR. According to the head of HR at Google, Lazio Bock, the overriding key of HR at Google is its emphasis on organizational culture and business objectives. The focus of Google HR is on giving its employees flexibility to produce results, not just following core job requirements. Consequently, HR at Google has established innovative efforts for its people and has made the administrative part of HR efficient. Minimizing numerous HR administrative forms, data, and reports by using technology has occurred, which would be expected in a prominent technology firm. At Google, HR communicates to its employees extensively about business objectives, organizational results, and relevant current information. Because many of the Google employees are stock shareholders also, they have a personal interest in Google being a successful business. Thus they continuously want to know the operational results by seeing current reports, data, and information. Overall, Google’s HR approach is unique in comparison to the approaches at other companies recognized by Fortune, but its success illustrates that how HR is established and operates can be a key to organizational success. A different firm with a variety of organizations and a strong HR culture is Scripps Network, a prominent television and communications corporation. At Scripps, HR plays a core role in establishing strategic goals and efforts. Even when Scripps has merged separate media firms, HR has focused on getting the cultures of the two entities to integrate effectively. Several HR functions are used to support the culture and core values at Scripps. One is an active pay-for-performance system to reward employees at higher job levels with base pay increases, annual incentives, and long-term incentives. Another key part of HR efforts at Scripps is that HR emphasizes leadership development throughout the firm. Additionally, the firm has widely used work variability efforts such as work-life balance, telecommuting, and worker flexible schedules. These are done as part of a core value at Scripps of “compassion/support.” A different firm with an extended history of effectively integrating corporate culture and HR is UPS, the transportation and logistics delivery firm that operates worldwide. Its culture is different from the cultures of Google and Scripps; however, for more than a decade, UPS has been recognized for its corporate integrity, culture, and HR inclusion with employees. UPS has emphasized linking HR with business objectives and uses communication and intranet programs to ensure that employees are kept constantly informed on business objectives and workforce challenges. One well-recognized component at UPS is the established codes of conduct that are consistently reviewed with all employees. These reviews include specific examples of ethical situations that employees may face and how to respond to them. Annually, managers complete a “conduct code” report that asks specific questions about ethical problems that have arisen during the year. These three firms are in different industries, have different cultures, and use a variety of HR efforts. However, each of them has been recognized for implementing HR as core to their organizational cultures and successful business results.51 ASSIGNMENT Review the supplemental case study HR, Culture, and Success at Google Scripps, and UPS. Provide an Introduction paragraph to briefly explain the case. Use a main heading for each case question to address the topic area being addressed. Provide a brief Conclusion paragraph at the end to give a brief synopsis. In your case analysis, demonstrate critical thinking along with research support (three credible sources that include at least one recent library journal article) to cover the situation and possible issues, along with providing suggestions for improvement. Consider yourself in the role of a consultant examining the firm and people who work there. What are the concerns to address if applicable? What suggestions and best practices elsewhere might be applied to make improvements? How might the firm implement your ideas? This is your opportunity to problem solve and practice a management perspective for a workplace. Use APA format for references at end of paper on separate last page, and use in-text cites in body where sources are applied to give proper credit. Double space the paper and indent the first word of each new paragraph. Your case analysis will be 2-3 pages for content. Include a cover sheet which identifies you as the student. Use a header with page number on top right corner. Save the file name with your last name and upload as an attachment using the title assignment link. The case analysis paper will be evaluated using the Supplemental Case Study Rubric. QUESTIONS 1. How does the integration of HR with the organizational culture contribute to the success of Google, Scripps, and UPS? To find ideas, go to the corporate website for each of these companies and search for additional insights. 2. Discuss how some of the cultural facets mentioned compare to those among employers you have worked for, and explain the difference in the views of these various employers

Do you want your assignment written by the best essay experts? Then look no further.  Order Now, and enjoy an amazing discount!!

The core assignment of this course is a documented research paper (1500-2000 words in length = approx. 6 – 8 pages double spaced, 12-point font). •The paper should support a thesis statement with information gained from research or investigation. •The paper will not be just a report presenting information, but will be a paper that carefully examines and presents your own historical interpretation of the topic you have chosen and your interpretation of the information you have gathered. •The paper may include consideration of problems and solutions, define key terms, or refute arguments against your thesis statement. It will be important to choose a topic of interest to you. •Approach this assignment with an open and skeptical mind, then form an opinion based on what you have discovered. •You must suspend belief while you are investigating and let the discoveries shape your opinion. (This is a thesis-finding approach.) •Once you have found your thesis, write the paper to support it. You will use some of the following critical thinking skills in this process: 1.Choosing an appropriate topic, limiting the topic 2.Gathering information, summarizing sources 3.Analyzing and evaluating sources 4.Defining key terms 5.Synthesizing information, comparing and contrasting sources 6.Testing a thesis, making a historical argument, using refutation 7.Amassing support for a position 8.Documenting sources Because this may be a longer paper than you have written before and a complex process is involved, it is recommended that you complete this paper using the following steps: 1.Choose a topic related to U.S. History up to 1877 (Chapters 1-15) that you would truly like to explore and that you are willing to spend some time on. Your chosen topic should be focused. Pose a question that you really want to answer. You may want to begin with more than one topic in mind. 2.Do some preliminary reading on the topic(s). You may begin with the textbook, then further explore the information available. Refine your topic. Summarize your topic, your interest in the topic, the questions you want to answer, and a hypothesis you want to test. 3.Gather information from a variety of sources. Use a minimum of four sources for your paper, and at least one must be a primary source. ◦Examples of primary sources are ones that are used in our discussion forums 2 – 8. ◦They are sources that are contemporary to the times under investigation. ◦An example of a secondary source is our textbook, though the textbook also contains excerpts of primary sources, which you may use as a source in your paper. 4.Outline the results of your research and the plan for your paper (you are not required to submit the outline). 5.Write the final draft and be sure to include a Works Cited List, and use the correct MLA documentation style. Grade Rubric INTRODUCTION & THESIS: The paper makes a clear and effective statement (the thesis) about the chosen topic. /15 FOCUS AND DEVELOPMENT: Body of the paper focuses on this thesis and develops it fully, recognizing the complexity of issues. /35 SUPPORT AND SYNTHESIS: Uses sufficient and relevant evidence to support the thesis (and primary points), including facts, inferences, and judgments. Quotes, summarizes, and paraphrases accurately and effectively–appropriately introducing and explaining each quote. /34 CONVENTIONS: Uses MLA format correctly; includes a Works Cited list; is free of errors. /18 CORRECTNESS AND STYLE: Shows critical thinking and depth of understanding; uses appropriate tone; shows sophistication in language usage and sentence structure. /18 TOTAL: 120 Submission Instructions Complete your assignment using word-processing software such as MS Word, Open Office (download free software at http://www.openoffice.org), or other per course requirements. 1.Save your file as an .rtf (rich text format) or word document. 2.Select the Browse My Computer button to navigate to the file.

For a custom paper on the above topic or any other topic, place your order now!

What Awaits you:  

• On-time delivery guarantee
• Masters and PhD-level writers
• Automatic plagiarism check
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
• High Quality custom-written papers

As part of a global environment, managers need to be aware of many legal regulations and customs of the countries they do business with. For this assignment, you will focus on how different countries accommodate disabilities.

To begin with, revisit how the U.S. accommodates disabilities through the Americans with Disabilities Act. Next, choose a country other than the United States and Japan to research. Study how disabilities are accommodated in that country (e.g., is there an equivalent to the Americans with Disabilities Act, accommodations in school, accessible areas, etc.?) Compare and contrast these accommodations with the U.S. information on how disabilities are accommodated here.

Be sure to include a short overview of the selected country and/or culture as a whole. Also include how the accommodation of disabilities affects the management of a diverse, international workforce. Submit an APA-formatted, 3-page paper on the topic, including appropriate citations as outside research is required.

For a custom paper on the above topic or any other topic, place your order now!

What Awaits you:  

• On-time delivery guarantee
• Masters and PhD-level writers
• Automatic plagiarism check
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
• High Quality custom-written papers

This is the book that is needed for reference.
Zimmerman, J. Accounting for Decision Making and Control 9th Edition, 2017 978-1-259-56455-0 McGraw Hill

1- Written Assignment: P 5-5 Discretionary Cost Analysis
2- Free Discussion Topics: Free discussions are topics of the students choosing but relevant to the chapter learning in the class. Discussion #1 –Must be presented in a “Compare and Contrast” forum, which is an analysis of similar and dissimilar areas of two subjects and a concluding summary. (subject Markets versus Firms chapter 4)
• Example: In Chapter 4, we learned about decision rights management and the concepts of centralized vs. decentralized decision-making power. Regardless of where an organization choses to house its decision-making power, there are key foundations that must be followed to ensure the process is followed and works efficiently:
o Central and decentralized decision-making must both be systematic and consistent. If the process is not followed, the organization could experience potentially negative impacts from those without the proper knowledge, experience, and leadership making uninformed decisions. Additionally, the process must be consistent; i.e. decision-making rights increase with responsibility and leadership within groups across the organization or all follow a decentralized approach where decision-making capabilities are spread throughout the organization.
o The basis of centralized and decentralized decision-making are both implemented as a means of control throughout the organization. Without a decision-making system process in place, a firm will fail as it lacks organization, direction, and leadership. Having a scattered approach is frustrating and leads to tensions within an organization. By having a decision-making process in place will provide for consistency and order.
o Decision-making processes foster responsibility and leadership skills. Whether an organization utilizes centralized or decentralized decision-making practices, it enables those with decision-making rights to be empowered. Through empowerment, these individuals will commit to more responsibility in the areas of their control and be more accountable for their respective areas.
As learned in the text, many differences also exist in these two approaches:
o Centralized and decentralized decision-making processes follow different structures. A centralized approach is more vertical, going up the organization; decision-making authority increases with that of managerial level and span of responsibility. On the other hand, a decentralized approach is more horizontal and spread across the organization and throughout various levels of responsibility and control. Decentralization of authority is more promoting of employee empowerment as it allows employees to make decisions which pertain to them and that are in their ‘wheelhouse’.
o An important factor to consider in terms of decision-making structure is that of time. A centralized approach tends to take longer for approval or denial of a decision. As decision-making rights increase with that of responsibility throughout a centralized organization, the time needed to make a decision also increases as it lies with limited individuals. Busy schedules, competing priorities, time away from the office, etc. can all hinder a centralized decision-making process whereas a decentralized approach is more flexible as more individuals exist to spread the responsibility and decision-making authority amongst.
o Organizational size also plays a part in the decision-making process. Centralized decision-making works best in a small organization where responsibility for decisions is held by few, but yet the time to reach decisions is also minimized. On the other hand, decentralized decision-making practices work best in large organizations where responsibility is held by many and decisions can be determined in a relatively short amount of time when given to the proper individual(s).
In research of the compare and contrasts of centralized and decentralized decision-making methods, it is evident that many contrasts exist; however, there are also many commonalities that must exist to ensure the processes are efficient. In the end, it is really what works best for the organization. It may depend upon organizational size, industry, longevity, etc. but also boils down to where management wants to house its responsibility and liability within the organization.

For a custom paper on the above topic or any other topic, place your order now!

What Awaits you:  

• On-time delivery guarantee
• Masters and PhD-level writers
• Automatic plagiarism check
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
• High Quality custom-written papers