SPSS Output Summary: Descriptive Statistics, Correlation, And Regression Study Description: A school educator is interested in determining the relationships between grade point average (GPA) and IQ scores among ninth graders. The educator takes a random sample of 40 ninth graders aged 14 years old and administers the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition (WISC-IV). The WISC-IV includes a Full Scale IQ (FSIQ; however for this assignment we will just call it IQ) that comprises verbal comprehension, perceptual reasoning, working memory, and processing speed skills.

Output file: See Week_2_SPSS_Output.pdfPreview the documentView in a new window.

Answer the following Questions:

Hypothesis – Formulate a hypothesis about the two variables. What do you think is the relationship between IQ scores and GPA Variables – Identify the variables and each of their attributes: discrete or continuous, quantitative or categorical, scale of measurement (nominal, ordinal, interval, or ratio), and independent or dependent. Descriptive statistics – Write an overview of the descriptive statistics (at least two paragraphs), including the appropriate and necessary statistical results within sentences and in proper APA formatting. Be sure to provide sufficient explanation for any numbers presented. Include the following in your discussion: How do the measures of central tendency and variability provide us with an overview of the characteristics and shape of the distribution of each variable What are these statistic Keeping in mind that the WISC-IV has a mean of 100 and Standard Deviation of 15, what assumptions could you make about the IQ scores and suitability of this IQ test for the group of students sampled Keeping in mind that the WISC-IV has a mean of 100 and Standard Deviation of 15, how many students’ IQ scores in this sample are within one standard deviation below the test’s mean Two standard deviations below the test’s mean What percentage of students in this sample had an IQ score less than or equal to 70 An IQ score greater or equal to 100 Correlation – Write an overview of the results of the correlation (at least two paragraphs), including the appropriate and necessary statistical results within sentences and in proper APA formatting. Be sure to provide sufficient explanation for any numbers presented. Consider the following in your overview and conclusions: Is there a significant correlation between IQ scores and GPA If so, what does a significant correlation mean Using the correlation table and scatterplot, explain whether the relationship is positive, negative, or no correlation. Describe the strength of the relationship (e.g. very strong, moderate, weak, etc.). What do the results tell us about our hypotheses What conclusions can we draw from these results What conclusions can we NOT make using these results What issues regarding the sample used or how the data was collected should be considered in the interpretation of the data Regression – Write an overview of the results of the regression (1 paragraph), including the appropriate and necessary statistical results within sentences and in proper APA formatting. Be sure to provide sufficient explanation for any numbers presented. Consider the following in your overview and conclusions: In the regression, what variable is the dependent variable and what variable is the independent variable What do the regression results tell us about IQ scores and GPA This assignment is worth 10 points of the total course grade. This assignment aligns with the following weekly outcomes: 1, 3. This assignment aligns with the following course outcomes: 1, 2, 3.
Formulates a hypothesis and discusses the relationship between IQ scores and GPA.
Total: 1.40
5 – Exceeds Expectations – (Observation)

Formulates a correct hypothesis and extensively discusses the relationship between IQ scores and GPA.
4 – Above Expectations – (Observation)

Formulates a correct hypothesis and adequately discusses the relationship between IQ scores and GPA.
3 – Meets Expectations – (Observation)

Formulates a hypothesis, either correct or incorrect, and adequately discusses the potential relationship between IQ scores and GPA.
2 – Below Expectations – (Observation)

Formulates an incomplete hypothesis and insufficiently discusses the potential relationship between IQ scores and GPA.
1 – Does Not Meet Expectations – (Observation)

Lacks a formulation of the hypothesis and a discussion of the relationship between IQ scores and GPA.

Identifies the variables and each of their attributes including discrete or continuous, quantitative or categorical, scale of measurement (nominal, ordinal, interval, or ratio), and independent or dependent.
Total: 1.40
5 – Exceeds Expectations – (Observation)

Identifies both variables and all attributes correctly.
4 – Above Expectations – (Observation)

Fully identifies both variables on three of the four attributes.

3 – Meets Expectations – (Observation)

Adequately identifies both variables on two of the four attributes or fully identifies at least one variable on three to four of the attributes.

2 – Below Expectations – (Observation)

Partially identifies both variables on one of the four attributes or identifies at least one variable on one to two of the four attributes.

1 – Does Not Meet Expectations – (Observation)

Does not correctly identify both variables on any of the four attributes.

Examines the descriptive statistics, including measures of central tendency and variability, and the suitability of the IQ test for this population (including numbers and percentages of student scores below and above the mean).
Total: 1.40
5 – Exceeds Expectations – (Observation)

Provides an extensive description of the statistics, including measures of central tendency and variability, and the suitability of the IQ test for this population (including numbers and percentages of student scores below and above the mean).
4 – Above Expectations – (Observation)

Provides an extensive description of the statistics, including measures of central tendency and variability, and the suitability of the IQ test for this population (including numbers and percentages of student scores below and above the mean), but lacks detail in some components of the assignment.
3 – Meets Expectations – (Observation)

Provides an adequate description of the statistics, including measures of central tendency and variability, and the suitability of the IQ test for this population (including numbers and percentages of student scores below and above the mean).
2 – Below Expectations – (Observation)

Minimally addresses the required components of the assignment.
1 – Exceeds Expectations – (Observation)

Lacks most of the required components of the assignment.

Analyzes the results of the correlation, including the nature and strength of the relationship, whether the results support the hypothesis, and what conclusions can be drawn. Identifies issues regarding the sample used or how the data was collected in the interpretation of the data.
Total: 1.40
5 – Exceeds Expectations – (Observation)

Effectively analyzes the results of the correlation, including the nature and strength of the relationship, whether the results support the hypothesis, and what conclusions can be drawn. Thoroughly identifies issues regarding the sample used or how the data was collected in the interpretation of the data.
4 – Above Expectations – (Observation)

Effectively analyzes the results of the correlation, but lacks sufficient detail in some components of the assignment.

3 – Meets Expectations – (Observation)

Presents the results of the correlation with adequate analysis of the required components of the assignment.

2 – Below Expectations – (Observation)

Presents the results of the correlation with minimal analysis of the required components of the assignment.

1 – Does Not Meet Expectations – (Observation)

Lacks analysis of the required components of the assignment.

Analyzes the results of the regression, including the variables and what the results show regarding IQ scores and GPA.
Total: 1.40
5 – Exceeds Expectations – (Observation)

Effectively analyzes results of the regression, and provides a thorough description of the variables and what the results show regarding IQ scores and GPA.
4 – Above Expectations – (Observation)

Effectively analyzes results of the regression, but lacks sufficient detail in some components of the assignment.
3 – Meets Expectations – (Observation)

Presents the results of the regression with adequate analysis of the required components of the assignment.
2 – Below Expectations – (Observation)

Presents the results of the regression with minimal analysis.
1 – Does Not Meet Expectations – (Observation)

Lacks analysis of the results of the regression.

Writing and Organization
Total: 1.50
5 – Demonstrates exemplary clarity and organization. The paper contains a well-articulated thesis statement, flawless mechanics, and precise APA formatting.

4 – Demonstrates effective clarity and organization. The paper contains a well-articulated thesis statement, proper mechanics, and correct APA formatting.
3 – Demonstrates adequate clarity and organization. The paper contains a clear thesis statement, adequate mechanics, and mostly correct APA formatting.
2 – Demonstrates some clarity and organization. The paper contains an unclear thesis statement, poor mechanics, and improper APA formatting.

1 – Lacking clarity and organization. The paper lacks a thesis statement, effective mechanics, and proper APA formatting.

Research
Total: 1.50
5 – Demonstrates exemplary critical analysis of the research materials. The student comprehensively uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.
4 – Demonstrates effective critical analysis of the research materials. The student fully uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.

3 – Demonstrates adequate critical analysis of the research materials. The student adequately uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.
2 – Demonstrates some critical analysis of the research materials. The student partially uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.

1 – Lacking critical analysis of the research materials. The student fails to use varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.

Do you want your assignment written by the best essay experts? Then look no further.  Order Now, and enjoy an amazing discount!!

What is the difference between “community intervention” and “intervention in the community” How can health advocates thoroughly address each in, for example, public policymaking of one of the following (choose one and discuss or choose a health concern of your own liking):100 words Youth violence Asthma in children Walking track and other public access to exercise/fitness Heart disease Lack of availability of health food (in stores, restaurants, etc.)

For a custom paper on the above topic or any other topic, place your order now!

What Awaits you:  

• On-time delivery guarantee
• Masters and PhD-level writers
• Automatic plagiarism check
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
• High Quality custom-written papers

Leveraging health care
How does technology detect new disease Start with this is a class on electronic health care records. How do these records detect disease Example: Technology can help people determine what diseases are contagious and an estimate of how many people have this disease. With knowing how many people have

Do you want your assignment written by the best essay experts? Then look no further.  Order Now, and enjoy an amazing discount!!

Purpose of Assignment

The purpose of this assignment is for students to learn how to apply Statistical Process Control Methods to a business process.

Assignment Steps

Resources: Microsoft® Excel® and PowerPoint®

Select a complex continuous process from your personal life or work. The process can be the same as in Week 1 assignment.

Complete the following:

Use Microsoft® Excel® to calculate the defined process metrics including variation and process capability.
Use Microsoft® Excel® and PowerPoint® to develop and display a control chart for the process.
Evaluate the control chart and process metrics using Statistical Process Control (SPC) methods.

Evaluate whether the process could benefit from the use of Six Sigma tools.

Develop a 525-word executive summary in which you describe your Statistical Process Control project and include the control chart with SPC.

ADD REFERENCES (Cite All References Properly)

Please see attached document ( Last week’s graded assignment, please use notes provided by professor to better write this week’s assignment.)

Format you

For a custom paper on the above topic or any other topic, place your order now!

What Awaits you:  

• On-time delivery guarantee
• Masters and PhD-level writers
• Automatic plagiarism check
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
• High Quality custom-written papers

r assignment consistent with APA guidelines.

Use the following questions below as a template and address all questions within your written assignment. This paper requires correct grammar, punctuation, and APA format.

Assignment #1 “Net Worth Terminology” is worth 100 points (10%) of your course weighted grade. A minimum of Two (2) references are required in proper APA format. References can come from a refereed peer reviewed journal article, course textbook, and or an Internet source.

The following below should be included in your assignment: This assignment requires 2-4 pages (Excluding Title and Reference Page). The assignment should be typed and submitted on a Word Document, font size 12 font, font names that should be used are times new roman or Calabria (not both), normal margins (no more than 1 inch), double spaced.

Review chapter 4 about net worth terminology and Exhibit 4-3.Find two separate articles that are healthcare industry/ organization related on two or more of the financial terms listed: Assets, Equity, Fund Balance, Liabilities and Net Worth. Note that the article’s publication date should be from September of 2013 to the current date.

Include your paper:

A brief summary of each articles (One paragraph (4-6 sentences) per summery
An explanation of two different financial terms listed (One paragraph (4-6 sentences) per financial term
A discussion of each terms’ application to healthcare finance (One paragraph (4-6 sentences) per term
Based on the two separate articles information presented, discuss whether the net worth terms you have found/used in your paper appears to be referring to for-profit corporations; for-profit sole proprietors or partnerships, or not-for-profit companies. What led you to believe this (One paragraph (4-6 sentences)
If you were the author of these articles, would you have been more specific If so, why If not, why not (One paragraph (4-6 sentences).
Reference link to articles in APA format.
Assignment #1: Net Worth Terminology

Grading Rubric:

This assignment requires 2-4 pages (Excluding Title and Reference Pages). The assignment should be APA format, typed on a Word Document, font size 12 font, font names that should be used are times new roman or Calabria (not both), normal margins (no more than 1 inch), double spaced.

For a custom paper on the above topic or any other topic, place your order now!

What Awaits you:  

• On-time delivery guarantee
• Masters and PhD-level writers
• Automatic plagiarism check
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
• High Quality custom-written papers