+1 (909) 375-5650
4982 Parkway Street, Los Angeles, CA 90017
support@smartwritingservice.com
800-888

Carlos Lopez

CASE STUDY HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT #1

 

Directions: Provide a brief answer to each of the questions below. A few sentences for each response would be adequate.

 

  1. Carlos Lopez was promoted three times in nine years at Versa Machinery Company. With each promotion, the managerial skills needed to do the job changed in importance. Did technical skills become more or less important for Carlos as he moved up the career ladder at Versa? What about conceptual/decision-making skills? What about interpersonal/communication skills?

 

 

 

 

  1. Carlos noticed that the nature of his planning responsibilities changed as well as he moved up in the company. Elaborate on this.

 

 

 

 

  1. There are four functions of management, according to the French industrialist Henri Fayol (planning, organizing, leading and controlling). With each successive promotion, did Carlos spend the same amount of time doing each of these things? If not, which functions do you think demanded more of his time and which might have required less time?

 

 

Building on Strengths

Building on Strengths

 

You may incorporate personal experiences and published sources to support your discussion. Be sure to add sources with author and year when citing references.

  • Discuss TWO strategies that you experienced or discovered in the literature that apply the framework for appreciative inquiry to strengthen the professional nurse role in transforming “blame and victim” healthcare environments to a system that fosters accountability, team building, and model work environments of excellence.
  • Provide professional sources as evidence to support your experiences or new ways of appreciating others in the work environment throughout your discussions.
  • Select discussions by peers and suggest new ways of promoting model work environments and ask questions to seek new meanings and understanding to advance the discussion.
  • Respond back to your peers/professor who commented on your discussion.

target market

Evaluate the following 2 countries to identify which represents the most potentially attractive target market for Lidl’s future international expansion strategy:

  • Mexico

 

  • Norway

 

In order to evaluate which of these 2 countries represents the most potentially attractive target market, you are required to undertake a comparative PESTEL analysis of those macro-environmental factors of the 2 countries that are relevant to Lidl.

– Worth 20% of the overall mark

– Not included in the word count

contraceptive methods

For this assignment, please review the following website and answer the 4 questions in 1-2 double spaced pages:

 

  1. Briefly compare and contrast twocontraceptive methods that are discussed on the website in terms of cost, effectiveness, and how it is used.
  2. Watch at least twovideos of real stories from one contraceptive method. For example, you could watch two real stories about the diaphragm. Did the two stories share anything in common? If so, what was it? Describe one thing you learned from each video about the method.
  3. Go to the Questionstab on the website and read at least onequestion and the answer that was provided. Why did you pick that question? Did you learn anything new? If so, what did you learn? If you did not learn anything new from reading the response, do you think that the respond was adequate? Why or why not?
  4. Please share your thoughts on the overall Bedsider website. Did you like it? If so, why? Describe what you like or dislike about the website. Is the website missing anything that you think should be provided?

 

 

 

engineering

Question 1

  1. Describe an engineering design standard of your choice.  Discuss the purpose of the standard and how it is intended to be used.
  2. Provide an example of how this standard would impact both requirements and design activities on an engineering project of your choice.

Question 2

  1. What are some negative outcomes if you fail to involve key stakeholders during an engineering project?
  2. What are some mechanisms you could employ on an engineering project to increase stakeholder involvement and interaction?

Question 3

  1. During the feasibility stage (and also throughout the project), you may need to conduct a structured trade study.  Describe the purpose and major activities involved in conducting a trade study.
  2. Evaluate at least two alternatives to a hypothetical need of your choice and defend why one alternative is the better choice using a structured trade study approach.

Question 4

  1. Projects typically follow a lifecycle that allows the project team to navigate from the end user’s “I Want” to their “I Got” (need to need fulfilment).  The lifecycle model selected by a project varies depending on the many factors including nature of the problem, the capability and maturity of the development team, and the expectation of the customers and end users.  Describe a lifecycle model of your choice and discuss the major milestones or phases of that model.
  2. Where in the lifecycle would you expect to see requirements baselined?
  3. Where in the lifecycle would you expect to see an architecture or high-level design?

labor law

Find a recent Supreme Court or U.S. Court of Appeals decision concerning a labor law issue. Briefly summarize the case and discuss the legal principles the court relies upon in determining the case decision. Your assignment should be approximately two pages and include at least two references other than your text. It has to be a recent Court Appeal.

Plagiarism and Paraphasing

Assignment Plagiarism and Paraphrasing To complete: Write a 1- to 2-page paper that addresses the following: • Explain how you tell a story or paraphrase in your own words and keep its meaning. Foundations of Scholarly Writing Part II • Explain how personal and cultural views on plagiarism might present challenges. • Identify and explain any evidence of plagiarism and/or paraphrasing that is found in the student passages provided. • Explain at least two strategies you might use to revise the student passages and avoid plagiarism. Reminder: Proper formatting and APA citations are required. Refer to the Writing Template for Course Papers for additional guidanceWhether or not an act of plagiarism is intentional or accidental, it can be a serious threat to a student’s academic integrity. To avoid plagiarism in your scholarly writing, it is important to recognize what it might look like and learn how to use paraphrasing instead. By paraphrasing and correctly citing the original author for his or her ideas, you are able to take the ideas of others, summarize them, and incorporate them into your own thinking.

For this Assignment, read the passages provided and compare the original passages to the student writing samples.
Example 1:
Passage 1:
Reference: Crossen, C. (1994). Tainted truth: The manipulation of fact in America. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Doctors, whose first allegiance is supposed to be to their patients, have traditionally stood between drug company researchers and trusting consumers. Yet unless there is evidence of misconduct (the deliberate misrepresentation of something as fact by someone who knows it is not), it is very difficult to discover and virtually impossible to prove that a piece of biomedical research has been tainted by conflict of interest. No study is perfect, and problems arise in the labs of even the most conscientious and honest researchers. Although biomedical research incorporates rigorous scientific rules and is often critically scrutinized by peers, the information can nevertheless be warped—by ending a study because the results are disappointing; changing rules mid-study; not trying to publish negative results; publicizing preliminary results even with final and less positive results in hand; skimming over or even not acknowledging drawbacks; and, especially, casting the results in the best light or, as scientists say, buffing them.
This next passage was written by a student who wants to use the Crossen resource in a paper and is trying not to plagiarize. Evaluate the student’s work for evidence of plagiarism and/or paraphrasing.
Passage 2:
Consumers must trust that the research that has gone into the manufacture of new drugs is safe. But it is hard to know if a conflict of interest between doctors, researchers, and the drug company stockholders has tainted the results. Biomedical researchers incorporate strict rules of science into their work, which is examined by peers. Yet the resulting information can be warped for five reasons: ending a study too soon, not publishing negative results, publishing results too early, skimming over or ignoring drawbacks, and “buffing” the results by showing them in the best light (Crossen, 1994, p. 167).
Example 2:
Passage 1:
Reference: O’Conner, P. (2003). Woe is I: The grammarphobe’s guide to better English in plain English. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.
A good writer is one you can read without breaking a sweat. If you want a workout, you don’t lift a book—you lift weights. Yet we’re brainwashed to believe that the more brilliant the writer, the tougher the going.

The truth is that the reader is always right. Chances are, if something you’re reading doesn’t make sense, it’s not your fault—it’s the writer’s. And if something you write doesn’t get your point across, it’s probably not the reader’s fault—it’s yours. Too many readers are intimidated and humbled by what they can’t understand, and in some cases that’s precisely the effect the writer is after. But confusion is not complexity; it’s just confusion. A venerable tradition, dating back to the ancient Greek orators, teaches that if you don’t know what you’re talking about, just ratchet up the level of difficulty and no one will ever know.

Don’t confuse simplicity, though, with simplemindedness. A good writer can express an extremely complicated idea clearly and make the job look effortless. But such simplicity is a difficult thing to achieve because to be clear in your writing you have to be clear in your thinking. This is why the simplest and clearest writing has the greatest power to delight, surprise, inform, and move the reader. You can’t have this kind of shared understanding if writer and reader are in an adversary relationship (pp. 195–196).
This last passage was written by a student who wants to use the O’Conner resource in a paper and is trying not to plagiarize. Analyze the student’s work for evidence of plagiarism and/or paraphrasing.
Passage 2:
Some people think the most intelligent writing should be difficult for readers to comprehend. However, this is a misconception about writing. Complicated sentences create unnecessary confusion and prevent readers from understanding the main ideas. Instead, simple and clear writing helps readers understand even the most difficult concepts. Therefore, writers have an important responsibility to express their thoughts and ideas in a way that is succinct, comprehensible, and engaging. A good writer should be mindful of who the target readers are and then use simple and clear language to communicate ideas (O’Conner, 2003).
To complete:
Write a 1- to 2-page paper that addresses the following:
• Explain how you tell a story or paraphrase in your own words and keep its meaning.
• Explain how personal and cultural views on plagiarism might present challenges.
• Identify and explain any evidence of plagiarism and/or paraphrasing that is found in the student passages provided.
• Explain at least two strategies you might use to revise the student passages and avoid plagiarism.
Reminder: Proper formatting and APA citations are required. Refer to the Writing Template for Course Papers for additional guidance.

Immanuel Kant Theories

1. What characterizes consequentialist moral theories, such as Utilitarianism? How do they work? Can you provide concrete examples?

2. How would you explain the Greatest Happiness Principle? How does it apply to concrete situations? Can you provide concrete examples?

3. What is the argument that we should maximize happiness (pleasure)?

4. What is John Stuart Mill’s argument for the claim that higher (intellectual) pleasures are intrinsically (in and of themselves) better than lower (sensual) pleasures?

5. How would you explain the practicality criticism that challenges Utilitarianism? Can you provide (your own) examples?

6. How would you explain the personal integrity criticism that challenges Utilitarianism? Can you provide (your own) examples?

7. How would you explain the ‘means and ends’ criticism that challenges Utilitarianism? Can you provide (your own) examples?

8. How would you explain the First Form of Kant’s Categorical Imperative? Can you provide (your own) examples of how it applies to concrete moral decisions?

9. How would you explain the Second Form of Kant’s Categorical Imperative? Can you provide (your own) examples of how it applies to concrete moral decisions?

10. How would you explain the criticism of Kant’s notion of right motive? Can you provide (your own) concrete examples?

11. How would you explain the criticism of the First Form of the Categorical Imperative? Can you provide (your own) concrete examples?

12. How would you explain the criticism of the Second Form of the Categorical Imperative? Can you provide (your own) concrete examples?

Nursing Informatics

Paul is a 12 year old male diabetic. He maintains his personal digital assistant (PDA), hand-held device, that interfaces with his glucometer and provides information based on inputted data from him and his parents. This information is transmitted to his MD/hospital, school nurse, case manager (CM), and to the parents’ home computer. All in an attempt to better control his diabetes. You are his CM.

The PDA sends an update to you since Paul’s blood glucose levels have been rising steadily for the last 5 days. The physician has left a message for you to contact this family and have them come in for an evaluation. You know that both of his parents work so you send an e-mail message to the parents’ via their home computer asking them to bring Paul in for an assessment. Since you are in a hurry and will be seeing other patients when they return from work, you decide to add more information to the message than normal reviewing with them the importance of maintaining control over the diabetes and expressing your concern since Paul has not checked in with you lately. You tell them that you think he might be over-doing it since he is trying to play football. You ask how they are doing and if they are still attending their counseling sessions.

Paul’s 4-year-old sister, Lilah, sends your email out to all of the diabetic lists that both Paul and his parents belong. They interact with people on these lists regularly.

The parents call everyone including you and are outraged that this information was sent everywhere….

Consider the following

1-How would you feel as the parents in this situation?

2-What is the problem? (Clearly state the problem)

3-What ethical principles would guide you in this case?

4-Name one alternative for solving this dilemma? (what could have the nurse done differently)

5-Are there any consequences to the alternative action you chose?