There’s an old adage that says that history is always written by the winners
Although this is not always the case, it is true that people’s sense of historical events is often influenced by the viewpoints of the historians who write about them. During the Watergate scandal in 1974, many policy pundits wrote columns demanding that President Richard Nixon resign from the presidency because he was, in their view, clearly culpable for the Watergate break-ins. Not all pundits felt this way, however.
Click here and here to read articles that offer differing views of President Nixon at the height of the Watergate scandal. Use the attached template to complete the following for this assignment: •Two Approaches to Watergate: Summarize the arguments made in each of the two articles regarding the conduct of President Nixon.
How might each of the author’s views impact the reader’s understanding of the Watergate crisis •Changing Views: Describe how the Watergate events changed American views toward politics and politicians. In your view, how did these events change the press coverage of politicians •
Please use the CTU Undergraduate Writing Style Guide for assistance on APA formatting. References Burch, D. (1974, May 14). In defense of Richard Nixon. Retrieved from The Harvard Crimson Web site: http://www.thecrimson.com/article/1974/5/14/in-defense-of-richard-nixon-pithe/ The Washington Post. (1973, May 1). Editorial: Watergate: The unfinished business. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/watergate/articles/050173-2.ht
For a custom paper on the above topic or any other topic, place your order now!
What Awaits you:
- On-time delivery guarantee
- Masters and PhD-level writers
- Automatic plagiarism check
- 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
- High Quality custom-written papers