Get an AnswerDid the Independent State of Moon acquire its statehood in international law despite its universal non-recognition by the international community of states? What was the significance of the universal non-recognition of the Independent State of Moon in international law?Smart Writing ServicesOctober 25, 2017 7:41 amOctober 25, 2017
Get an AnswerIn response to appeal for recognition by the Republic of Star, a number of existing states including some powerful ones, which are permanent members of the UN Security Council. Indeed, five of such existing states have rendered their full diplomatic recognition to the Republic of Star which has actively been engaged in a bloody civil war with its parent state, as the parent state sought to suppress the secessionist bid. In this civil war however the liberation army of the Republic of Star has suffered a military defeat. And the Republic of Star, after surviving for ten years with formal recognition from five states and informal recognition from others, is now eventually reabsorbed with its parent state. The Republic of Star no longer exists as a state in international law. The situation of the Independent State of Moon appears to be somewhat different. Instead of waging a civil war, its parent state opted to launch a diplomatic campaign against the UDI of Moon and managed to persuade the world community and its forum, the UN, not to recognise the situation generated by the UDI of Moon. The response of the international community and UN members was overwhelming. The entire international community of states and the UN did not recognize the UDI of Moon. Even the UN General Assembly and the Security Council went further by adopting a series of resolutions condemning the UDI of Moon and calling upon UN members not to recognize the so-called Independent State of Moon. Thus the Independent State of Moon remains universally unrecognised but continues to survive and operate as an entity with all features of statehood independent of its parent stateSmart Writing ServicesOctober 25, 2017 7:41 amOctober 25, 2017
Get an AnswerOscar is a motor mechanic who operates a garage. Inside his garage a sign reads “owners liability at own risk, please do not enter.” He decides to offer half-price tune-ups to regular customers to reward their loyalty and identifies his 50 most regular customers from his records and mails the offer to them, addressed to: “Dear Valued Regular Customer”. Oscar’s letter states the discount will be available to anyone replying within two months of the date of the letterSmart Writing ServicesOctober 25, 2017 7:41 amOctober 25, 2017
Get an AnswerUnderstanding Specific needs in Health and Social Care, Facilitating Change in Health and Social Care and Health Promotion, Managing Quality in Health and Social Care.Smart Writing ServicesOctober 25, 2017 7:41 amOctober 25, 2017
Get an AnswerThe efficacy and safety of novel weight loss diets (such as low Carb diet).Smart Writing ServicesOctober 25, 2017 7:41 amOctober 25, 2017
Get an AnswerDiscuss the aetiology of obesity and relate your findings to possible treatment strategies. You should describe the mechanisms at workSmart Writing ServicesOctober 25, 2017 7:41 amOctober 25, 2017
Get an AnswerCompare 2 major treatment strategies for obesity and discuss the extent to which we understand the mechanisms, by which they work, and identify the place of your chosen strategies within integrative treatment approachSmart Writing ServicesOctober 25, 2017 7:41 amOctober 25, 2017
Get an AnswerDiscuss the role of consuming energy dense diets and lack of physical activity in contributing to the rising rates of obesity, what approach could be used to modify these behaviours?Smart Writing ServicesOctober 25, 2017 7:41 amOctober 25, 2017
Get an AnswerDiscuss the merits of surgical and pharmacological approaches to the treatment of obesity. (perhaps consider efficacy and/or financial costs and/or ethical issues and/or nutritional issues)Smart Writing ServicesOctober 25, 2017 7:41 amOctober 25, 2017
Get an AnswerDirective 2008/101, inasmuch as it extends application of the scheme laid down by Directive 2003/87 to aviation, does not infringe the principle of territoriality or the sovereignty which the third States from or to which such flights are performed have over the airspace above their territory, since those aircraft are physically in the territory of one of the Member States of the European Union and are thus subject on that basis to the unlimited jurisdiction of the European UnionSmart Writing ServicesOctober 25, 2017 7:41 amOctober 25, 2017
