Get an AnswerWhat legal and ethical justifications for the doctrine of vicarious liability can you identify? How many are appropriate in the modern world?Smart Writing ServicesOctober 25, 2017 7:42 amOctober 25, 2017Previous ArticleThe paper must be about the following three female photographers from the 1930s, Dorothea Lange, Charlotte Brooks, and Louise RosskamNext ArticleThe doctrine of vicarious liability lies at the heart of all civil and law systems of tort law. It represents not a tort, but a rule of responsibility which renders the defendant liable for the torts committed by another. The classic case is that of employer and employee: the employer is rendered strictly liable for the torts of his employees, provided that they are committed in the course of the tortfeasor's employment. In such cases, liability is imposed on the employer, not because of his own wrongful act, but due to his relationship with the tortfeasor. The claimant is thus presented with two potential defendants: the individual tortfeasor and a third party, likely to be with means and/or insured and usually clearly identifiable in circumstances where it may be difficult to identify the actual culprit in question
