Get an AnswerHow will your reward your staff members who show great improvementsSmart Writing ServicesOctober 25, 2017 7:40 amOctober 25, 2017Previous ArticleIn its discussion of accessory liability under the second limb of Barnes v Addy (1874) LR 9 Ch App 244, the High Court in Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 236 ALR 209 affirmed and clarified a test based on knowledge and left for another day the question as to whether accessory liability under the second limb of Barnes v Addy should be reformulated on the basis of dishonesty as applied by the Privy Council in Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan [1995] 2 AC 378. Discuss and compare the two different approaches to determining accessory liability under English law and Australian law respectively. In your discussion, consider also the extent to which if at all, each approach may result in a different outcome. Your answer should assess the advantages and disadvantages of each of them together with the approach which you favour and the reasons for that conclusionNext ArticleOne of the key roles of nutritionists and dieticians is to design meal plans for people with special dietary requirements. This requires a detailed understanding of the patient’s situation, their energy and nutrient requirements, and the various foods that must in some cases be avoided. In some cases it can be extremely challenging to create meals that are nutritionally adequate and palatable whilst keeping within the dietary constraints imposed by the patient’s condition
